This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/281/70
Case T-257/06: Action brought on 15 September 2006 — Budějovický Budvar v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (word mark BUD )
Case T-257/06: Action brought on 15 September 2006 — Budějovický Budvar v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (word mark BUD )
Case T-257/06: Action brought on 15 September 2006 — Budějovický Budvar v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (word mark BUD )
SL C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 39–40
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.11.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 281/39 |
Action brought on 15 September 2006 — Budějovický Budvar v OHIM — Anheuser-Busch (word mark ‘BUD’)
(Case T-257/06)
(2006/C 281/70)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: Budějovický Budvar, národní podnik (České Budějovice, Czech Republic) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul the contested decision R 802/2004-2 of 28 June 2006 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM; |
|
— |
reject application No 1 737 121 for registration of the word mark ‘BUD’ to designate services in Classes 35, 38, 41 and 42; |
|
— |
send the decision of the Court of First Instance to OHIM; |
|
— |
order Anheuser-Busch to pay all the costs and expenses. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for the Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BUD’ for services in Classes 35, 38, 41 and 42 — Application No 1 737 121
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Protected designation of origin ‘BUD’ to designate beer
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 62(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (1) and Article 20 of implementing Regulation No 2868/95 (2) in that the Board of Appeal is not competent to rule on the validity of the designation of origin invoked by the applicant in the context of its opposition. It further submits that the sign ‘BUD’ constitutes a designation of origin, protected in both France and Austria. The applicant also invokes misapplication of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94 in that, in its view, the designation of origin ‘BUD’ is indeed a sign used in the course of trade.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).
(2) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1995 L 303, p. 1).