This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/261/48
Case T-242/06: Action brought on 5 September 2006 — Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM — Industrias Cárnicas Valle (El charcutero artesano)
Case T-242/06: Action brought on 5 September 2006 — Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM — Industrias Cárnicas Valle (El charcutero artesano)
Case T-242/06: Action brought on 5 September 2006 — Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM — Industrias Cárnicas Valle (El charcutero artesano)
SL C 261, 28.10.2006, p. 25–26
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.10.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 261/25 |
Action brought on 5 September 2006 — Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM — Industrias Cárnicas Valle (El charcutero artesano)
(Case T-242/06)
(2006/C 261/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Miguel Cabrera Sánchez (Móstoles, Spain) (represented by: J. A. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 June 2006 in Case R-790/2005-1; |
|
— |
annul Decision 2239/2005 in opposition No 637 647; |
|
— |
order the Opposition Division to refuse in full registration of the mark concerned; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative colour mark EL CHARCUTERO ARTESANO (Application No 2 823 193) for goods in Class 29
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark (No 2 047 511) EL CHARCUTERO for goods in Class 29
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition and registration of the mark applied for
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark