Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/314/47

    Judgment of the Court of First Instance 12 October 2004 in Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A. v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for registration of Community word mark CARPO — Earlier national word mark HARPO Z — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    SL C 314, 18.12.2004, p. 18–19 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    18.12.2004   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 314/18


    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

    12 October 2004

    in Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A. v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for registration of Community word mark CARPO - Earlier national word mark HARPO Z - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    (2004/C 314/47)

    Language of the case: Spanish

    In Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A., established in Lyon (France), represented by Enrique Armijo Chávarri, lawyer, v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings being BASF Aktiengesellschaft, established in Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany), for the annulment of Decision R 803/2001-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2002 concerning the opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark HARPO Z to registration of the trade mark CARPO, the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; Registrar: I. Natsinas, administrator, gave a judgment on 12 October 2004, in which it:

    1.

    Dismisses the application;

    2.

    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.


    (1)   OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003.


    Top