This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/217/33
Case C-291/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) by judgment of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Ministère Public against Léon Henri Schmitz
Case C-291/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) by judgment of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Ministère Public against Léon Henri Schmitz
Case C-291/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) by judgment of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Ministère Public against Léon Henri Schmitz
SL C 217, 28.8.2004, p. 17–17
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
28.8.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 217/17 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) by judgment of that court of 4 June 2004 in the case of Ministère Public against Léon Henri Schmitz
(Case C-291/04)
(2004/C 217/33)
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities for a preliminary ruling by judgment of the Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) of 4 June 2004, in the case of Ministère Public against Léon Henri Schmitz, which was received at the Court Registry on 9 July 2004.
The Tribunal de Police, Neufchâteau (Belgium) asks the Court of Justice to give a preliminary ruling on the following question:
Do Articles 10, 39, 43 and 49 of the EEC Treaty preclude a Member State from adopting a measure requiring a worker who is resident within its territory to register his vehicle there even when that vehicle belongs to his employer, a company established in another Member State and to which that worker is linked by an employment contract but in which at the same time he occupies the position of shareholder, director, day-to-day manager or similar?