EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2004/217/14

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 July 2004 Case C-292/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (Member State's failure to fulfil obligations — Environment — End-of-life vehicles — Directive 2000/53/EC)

SL C 217, 28.8.2004, p. 8–8 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.8.2004   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/8


JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Fourth Chamber)

of 8 July 2004

Case C-292/03: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (1)

(Member State's failure to fulfil obligations - Environment - End-of-life vehicles - Directive 2000/53/EC)

(2004/C 217/14)

Language of the case: Finnish

In Case C-292/03: Commission of the European Communities (Agents: M. Konstantinidis and P. Aalto) v Republic of Finland (Agent: A. Guimaraes-Purokoski) — application for a declaration that, by having failed to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles (OJ No L 269, p. 34) or, in any event, by having failed to inform the Commission thereof, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive — the Court (Fourth Chamber), composed of: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, President of the Chamber, F. Macken (Rapporteur) and K. Lenaerts, Judges; M. Poiares Maduro, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 July 2004 in which it:

1.

Declares that, by having failed to adopt the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary in order to comply with Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

2.

Orders the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 213 of 6.9.2003.


Top