This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0180
Case T-180/13: Action brought on 21 March 2013 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and others v Council
Case T-180/13: Action brought on 21 March 2013 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and others v Council
Case T-180/13: Action brought on 21 March 2013 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and others v Council
SL C 147, 25.5.2013, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.5.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 147/29 |
Action brought on 21 March 2013 — Pesquerias Riveirenses and others v Council
(Case T-180/13)
2013/C 147/52
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicants: Pesquerias Riveirenses, SL (Ribeira, Spain); Pesquerias Campo de Marte, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Anpajo, SL (Ribeira); Arrastreros del Barbanza, SA (Ribeira); Martínez Pardavila e Hijos, SL (Ribeira); Lijo Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Frigoríficos Hermanos Vidal, SA (Ribeira); Pesquera Boteira, SL (Ribeira); Francisco Mariño Mos y Otros, CB (Ribeira); Juan Antonio Pérez Vidal y Hermano, CB (Ribeira); Marina Nalda, SL (Ribeira); Portillo y Otros, SL (Ribeira); Vidiña Pesca, SL (Ribeira); Pesca Hermo, SL (Ribeira); Pescados Oubiña Perez, SL (Ribeira); Manuel Pena Graña (Ribeira); Campo Eder, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Laga, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jalisco, SL (Ribeira); Pesquera Jopitos, SL (Ribeira); y Pesca-Julimar, SL (Ribeira) (represented by: J. Tojeiro Sierto, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
— |
The applicants claim that the General Court should annul Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 in so far as it amalgamates the northern and southern components of the stock of blue whiting in the north-east Atlantic in order to establish the TAC (total allowable catch) for blue whiting set out in Annexes IA and IB (pages 84 and 103, respectively; OJ 2013 L 23, p. 54). |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 39 TFEU
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 and Article 6 of the New York Agreement of 1995
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality
|