Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013CN0082

    Case C-82/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 19 February 2013 — Società cooperativa Madonna dei Miracoli v Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

    SL C 147, 25.5.2013, p. 8–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.5.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 147/8

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 19 February 2013 — Società cooperativa Madonna dei Miracoli v Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

    (Case C-82/13)

    2013/C 147/15

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Consiglio di Stato

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Società cooperativa Madonna dei Miracoli

    Respondents: Regione Abruzzo, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is it the case that the European Commission has cancelled the grant of the Community contribution and what was the decision adopted?

    In the alternative:

    2.

    What legal effect is to be attached to the Commission’s failure to act, as a result of which the Community contribution was not paid?

    3.

    Does the Commission’s failure to act by non-disbursement of the Community contribution preclude the application of Article 42(a) of Abruzzo Regional Law 31/82, under which the appellant was granted the regional contribution ancillary to the Community contribution and, consequently, [does that failure] preclude payment of the regional contribution?

    At all events:

    4.

    What are the obligations incumbent on the Italian State in the case of the European Commission’s persistent failure to act?
    Top