Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TB0255

    Case T-255/12: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Vakili v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran in order to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned — No need to adjudicate)

    SL C 46, 16.2.2013, p. 18–18 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.2.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 46/18


    Order of the General Court of 12 December 2012 — Vakili v Council

    (Case T-255/12) (1)

    (Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran in order to prevent nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - No need to adjudicate)

    2013/C 46/33

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Bahman Vakili (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: J.-M. Thouvenin, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and I. Rodios, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Action for annulment of Council Decision 2011/783/CFSP of 1 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 71); Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1245/2001 of 1 December 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 319, p. 11) and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1),, insofar as those acts concern the applicant, and of the decision contained in the Council’s letter of 23 March 2012.

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application.

    2.

    The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs incurred by Mr Bahman Vakili and bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 258, 25.8.2012.


    Top