EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0487
Case T-487/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Banco Privado Português, S.A. and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português v Commission
Case T-487/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Banco Privado Português, S.A. and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português v Commission
Case T-487/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Banco Privado Português, S.A. and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português v Commission
SL C 340, 19.11.2011, p. 28–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
19.11.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/28 |
Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Banco Privado Português, S.A. and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português v Commission
(Case T-487/11)
2011/C 340/57
Language of the case: Portuguese
Parties
Applicants: Banco Privado Português, S.A. — em liquidação (‘BPP’) and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português, S.A. — em liquidação (‘assets in the insolvency’) (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: C. Fernandez, F. Pereira Coutinho, M. Esperança Pina, T. Mafalda Santos, R. Leandro Vasconcelos and A. Kéri, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
— |
Annul Commission Decision No 2011/346/EU of 20 July 2010 on the State aid C 33/09 (ex NN 57/09, CP 191/09) implemented by Portugal in the form of a State guarantee to BPP (‘the contested decision’); (1) |
— |
Or, alternatively, annul the contested decision in so far as it declared the State aid involved in the guarantee to be unlawful and incompatible for the period between 5 December 2008 and 5 June 2009; |
— |
Alternatively, annul the contested decision in so far as it ordered the recovery of the (alleged) aid under Articles 2 to 4 thereof; |
— |
Alternatively, annul the contested decision in so far as it ordered recovery between 5 December 2008 and 5 June 2009; |
— |
Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on the following pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law: lack of reasoning:
|
2. |
Second plea in law: infringement of Article 107(3) TFEU:
|
3. |
Third plea in law: manifest error of assessment of the facts and consequently infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law: infringement of Article 108(2) TFEU
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law: infringement of the right to sound administration:
|
6. |
Sixth plea in law: infringement of the principles of legal certainty and of the protection of legitimate expectations:
|
7. |
Seventh plea in law: infringement of the right to fair treatment:
|