This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TN0266
Case T-266/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — El Gazaerly v Council
Case T-266/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — El Gazaerly v Council
Case T-266/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — El Gazaerly v Council
SL C 219, 23.7.2011, p. 20–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.7.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 219/20 |
Action brought on 19 May 2011 — El Gazaerly v Council
(Case T-266/11)
2011/C 219/31
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Naglaa Abdallah El Gazaerly (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Pannick, QC (Queen's Counsel), R. Lööf, Barrister, and M. O'Kane, Solicitor)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
— |
Annul, in so far as it concerns the applicant, Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 63); |
— |
Annul, in so far as it concerns the applicant, Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2011 L 76, p. 4), implementing Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP; |
— |
Order the defendant to pay damages in sum of EUR 10 000; and |
— |
Order the defendant to bear the applicant’s costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that Article 29 TEU is an erroneous and/or insufficient legal basis for Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP, as:
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the inclusion of the applicant within the ambit of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 violates his right to effective judicial protection. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the inclusion of the applicant within the ambit of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 violates the principle of proportionality. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the applicant has suffered damages as a direct result of the adoption of Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, which fall to be made good by the Union. |