EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TJ0280
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2012. # Rita Ewald v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Keen - Community figurative mark KIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009. # Case T-280/11.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2012.
Rita Ewald v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Keen - Community figurative mark KIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-280/11.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2012.
Rita Ewald v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Keen - Community figurative mark KIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T-280/11.
Izvješća Suda EU-a 2012 -00000
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2012:237
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 May 2012 —
Ewald v OHIM — Kin Cosmetics (Keen)
(Case T‑280/11)
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Keen — Community figurative mark KIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009
Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 17, 37)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2011 (Case R 1383/2010‑1), relating to opposition proceedings between Kin Cosmetics, SA and Ms Rita Ewald. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Ms Rita Ewald to pay the costs. |