This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0664
Case T-664/11: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-664/11: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-664/11: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application — No need to adjudicate)
SL C 32, 2.2.2013, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
2.2.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 32/18 |
Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA)
(Case T-664/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 32/28
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Royal Mediterranea, SA (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2011 (Case R 1976/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and Royal Mediterranea, SA.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |