Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TA0272

    Case T-272/11: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin — Earlier national, Community and international figurative marks coin — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    SL C 79, 16.3.2013, p. 15–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.3.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 79/15


    Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin)

    (Case T-272/11) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin - Earlier national, Community and international figurative marks coin - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    2013/C 79/27

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Coin SpA (Venice, Italy) (represented by: P. Perani and G. Ghisletti, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: Ó. Mondéjar Ortuño, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dynamiki Zoi AE (Athens, Greece)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2011 (Case R 1836/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Coin SpA and Dynamiki Zoi AE.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 21 February 2011 (Case R 1836/2010-2) in so far as it rejected the opposition as regards the ‘Clothing, including footwear and slippers’ in Class 25;

    2.

    Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

    3.

    Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay a third of the costs incurred by Coin SpA;

    4.

    Orders Coin to bear two-thirds of its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.


    Top