Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011CA0314

    Case C-314/11 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2012 — European Commission v Planet AE (Appeals — Protection of the financial interests of the European Union — Identification of the level of risk associated with an entity — Early warning system — OLAF investigation — Decisions — Requests for activation of W1a and W1b warnings — Reviewable measures — Admissibility)

    SL C 46, 16.2.2013, p. 6–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    16.2.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 46/6


    Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2012 — European Commission v Planet AE

    (Case C-314/11 P) (1)

    (Appeals - Protection of the financial interests of the European Union - Identification of the level of risk associated with an entity - Early warning system - OLAF investigation - Decisions - Requests for activation of W1a and W1b warnings - Reviewable measures - Admissibility)

    2013/C 46/11

    Language of the case: Greek

    Parties

    Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and F. Dintilhac, acting as Agents)

    Other party to the proceedings: Planet AE (represented by: V. Christianos, dikigoros)

    Re:

    Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 April 2011 in Case T-320/09 Planet AE v Commission dismissing the plea of inadmissibility raised by the European Commission in an action for the annulment of Commission decisions, taken following investigation by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), to activate, in the early warning system (EWS), a ‘W1a’ registration and subsequently a ‘W1b’ registration, identifying the level of risk associated with the applicant as a party awarded a public service contract concerning a project for institutional and sectoral modernisation in Syria, funded under the MEDA programme (OJ 2005 S 203-199730).

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2.

    Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.


    Top