This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TO0452
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2011.#ClientEarth v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party - Manifest inadmissibility.#Case T-452/10.
Rješenje Općeg suda (šesto vijeće) od 6. rujna 2011.
ClientEarth protiv Vijeća Europske unije.
Tužba za poništenje - Očita nedopuštenost.
Predmet T-452/10.
Rješenje Općeg suda (šesto vijeće) od 6. rujna 2011.
ClientEarth protiv Vijeća Europske unije.
Tužba za poništenje - Očita nedopuštenost.
Predmet T-452/10.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:420
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 September 2011 – ClientEarth v Council
(Case T-452/10)
Action for annulment – Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party – Manifest inadmissibility
Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Conditions relating to a signatory – Third party capacity in relation to the parties – Charity represented by one of its trustees – Inadmissibility – Trustee being neither an employee nor a director entrusted with the daily management of the association – No effect (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 19, third and fourth paras; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 43(1), first para.) (see paras 15-20)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of the Council decision of 26 July 2010 refusing to grant the applicant full access to an opinion of the Council’s Legal Service (Document No 6865/09) on the European Parliament’s draft amendments to the Commission’s proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43). |
Operative part
1. |
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
2. |
ClientEarth is ordered to bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
3. |
The Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden are ordered to bear their own respective costs. |