Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62010TJ0403

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011.
    Brighton Collectibles, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
    Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON - National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Case T-403/10.

    Izvješća Suda EU-a 2011 II-00325*

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:538





    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011 – Brighton Collectibles v OHIM – Felmar (BRIGHTON)

    (Case T-403/10)

    Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON – National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009

    Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 44-47)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2010 (Case R 408/2009-4) concerning an opposition procedure between Brighton Collectibles Inc. and Felmar.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Brighton Collectibles Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

    3.

    Orders Felmar to bear its own costs.

    Top