This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0120
Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate)
SL C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 16–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.1.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 6/16 |
Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission
(Case T-120/10) (1)
(Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - Refusal to amend the form of order sought - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 6/30
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E) (Brussels, Belgium); European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels); BirdLife International (Brussels) (represented by: S. Hockman QC, and by P. Kirch, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 9 February 2010 refusing access to certain documents relating to biofuels modelling
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth, the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and BirdLife International. |