EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TA0522
Case T-522/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Hell Energy Magyarország v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark HELL — Earlier Community word mark HELLA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-522/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Hell Energy Magyarország v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark HELL — Earlier Community word mark HELLA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-522/10: Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Hell Energy Magyarország v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark HELL — Earlier Community word mark HELLA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
SL C 58, 25.2.2012, p. 9–9
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.2.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 58/9 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 January 2012 — Hell Energy Magyarország v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL)
(Case T-522/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark HELL - Earlier Community word mark HELLA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 58/15
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Hell Energy Magyarország kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: M. Treis, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Hansa Mineralbrunnen GmbH (Rellingen, Germany) (represented by: A. Renck, V. von Bomhard, E. Nicolás Gómez and T. Dolde, lawyers)
Re:
Action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2010 (Case R 1517/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Hansa Mineralbrunnen GmbH and Hell Energy Magyarország.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hell Energy Magyarország kft to pay the costs. |