EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009TB0444

Case T-444/09: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2012 — La City v OHIM — Bücheler and Ewert (citydogs) (Community trade mark — Appointment of a new representative — Applicant’s failure to act — No need to adjudicate)

SL C 209, 14.7.2012, p. 7–7 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

14.7.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/7


Order of the General Court of 16 May 2012 — La City v OHIM — Bücheler and Ewert (citydogs)

(Case T-444/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Appointment of a new representative - Applicant’s failure to act - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 209/11

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: La City (La Courneuve, France) (represented initially by: S. Bénoliel-Claux, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner and R. Pethke, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Andreas Bücheler and Konstanze Ewert (Engelskirchen, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 August 2009 (Case R 233/2008-1) relating to opposition proceedings between (1) La City and (2) Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert.

Operative part of the order

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.

2.

La City, the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and Mr Andreas Bücheler and Ms Konstanze Ewert shall each bear their own costs.


(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.


Top