Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0487

Presuda Općeg suda (osmo vijeće) od 16. lipnja 2010.
Kureha Corp. protiv Ureda za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (OHIM).
Žig Zajednice - Postupak povodom prigovora.
Predmet T-487/08.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:237





Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2010 – Kureha v OHIM – Sanofi‑Aventis (KREMEZIN)

(Case T-487/08)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark KREMEZIN – Earlier international word mark KRENOSIN – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the goods – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) – Proof of existence of the earlier trade mark – Time-limits – Rules 19 and 20 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

1.                     Community trade mark – Observations of third parties and opposition – Examination of the opposition – Proof of use of the earlier mark – Partial use – Effect (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 43(2) and (3)) (see paras 56-57)

2.                     Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 68-69, 90)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1631/2007‑4), concerning opposition proceedings between Sanofi-Aventis SA and Kureha Corp.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Kureha Corp.

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark KREMEZIN for goods in Class 5 – Application No 2906501

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Sanofi-Aventis SA

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

International trade mark registration No 529937 of the word mark KRENOSIN for goods in Class 5

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Appeal dismissed


Operative part

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Kureha Corp. to pay its own costs and those of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

3.

Orders Sanofi-Aventis SA to bear its own costs.

Top