Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0187

    Presuda Općeg suda (prvo vijeće) od 20. travnja 2010.
    Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd protiv Ureda za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (OHIM).
    Žig Zajednice.
    Predmet T-187/08.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:150





    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 20 April 2010 – Rodd & Gunn Australia v OHIM (Representation of a dog)

    (Case T-187/08)

    Community trade mark – Figurative Community trade mark representing a dog – Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration – Request for renewal of the mark – Application for restitutio in integrum – Article 78 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    Community trade mark – Procedural provisions – Restitutio in integrum (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 78(1)) (see para. 29)

    Re:

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2008 (Case R 1245/2007-4) relating to an application for restitutio in integrum .

    Information relating to the case

    Community trade mark sought:

    Figurative mark consisting of a representation of a dog for goods in Classes 16, 18, and 25 – Community trade mark No 339218

    Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department:

    Application for restitutio in integrum dismissed

    Decision of the Board of Appeal:

    Appeal dismissed


    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd to pay the costs.

    Top