Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TJ0183

Presuda Prvostupanjskog suda (osmo vijeće) od 13. svibnja 2009.
Schuhpark Fascies GmbH protiv Ureda za usklađivanje na unutarnjem tržištu (žigovi i dizajni) (OHIM).
Žig Zajednice - Postupak povodom prigovora.
Predmet T-183/08.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2009:156





Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 13 May 2009 – Schuhpark Fascies v OHIM – Leder & Schuh (jello SCHUHPARK)

(Case T-183/08)

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative and word mark jello SCHUHPARK – Earlier national word mark Schuhpark – Relative ground for refusal – Proof of use of earlier mark – Article 43(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94

Community trade mark – Observations of third parties and opposition – Examination of the opposition – Proof of use of the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 43(2) and (3)) (see paras 20-24)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2008 (Case R 1560/2006-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Schuhpark Fascies GmbH and Leder & Schuh AG.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Leder & Schuh AG

Community trade mark sought:

Word and figurative mark jello SCHUHPARK for goods in Classes 1, 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24 to 26 and 28 – Application No 1269372

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Schuhpark Fascies GmbH

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

German word mark Schuhpark for goods in Class 25 and, in that respect, the opposition was directed against registration in Classes 18, 21, 25 and 26

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Opposition upheld in part and application for registration rejected in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Annulment of the appealed decision and rejection of the opposition


Operative part

The Court:

1.      Dismisses the action;

2.      Orders Schuhpark Fascies GmbH to pay the costs.

Top