Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008CO0146

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2009.
Efkon AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.
Appeals - Directive 2004/52/EC - Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community - Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded.
Case C-146/08 P.

Izvješća Suda EU-a 2009 I-00049*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2009:201





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 March 2009 – Efkon v Parliament and Council

(Case C‑146/08 P)

Appeals – Directive 2004/52/EC – Interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Appeal manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Directive on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community – Action brought by a supplier of those systems (Art. 230, fourth para., EC; European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/52) (see paras 36-42)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 22 January 2008 in Case T-298/04 Efkon v Parliament and Council , by which that Court dismissed as inadmissible the action for annulment of Directive 2004/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the Community (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 124) – Requirement that the contested measure should be of individual concern – Right to a fair hearing – Duration of the proceedings before the Court of First Instance.

Operative part:

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Efkon AG is ordered to pay the costs.


Top