Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0096

Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 March 2009 — Telecom Italia Media v Commission Case T-96/07 (State aid — Subsidies for the purchase of digital decoders — Telecommunications — Commission decision finding aid to be incompatible with the common market — Decision of the Member State, adopted during the proceedings, not to recover the aid from the undertaking which brought the action for annulment against the Commission decision — No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

SL C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.5.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/35


Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 March 2009 — Telecom Italia Media v Commission

Case T-96/07 (1)

(State aid - Subsidies for the purchase of digital decoders - Telecommunications - Commission decision finding aid to be incompatible with the common market - Decision of the Member State, adopted during the proceedings, not to recover the aid from the undertaking which brought the action for annulment against the Commission decision - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2009/C 113/72

Language of the case: Italian.

Parties

Applicant: Telecom Italia Media (TI Media) SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Bassam and S. Venturini, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Righini, G. Conte and B. Martenczuk, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Sky Italia Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. González Díaz and D. Gerard, lawyers)

Re:

Action for the annulment of Commission Decision 2007/374/EC of 24 January 2007 on State aid C 52/2005 (ex NN 88/2005, ex CP 101/2004) implemented by the Italian Republic for the subsidised purchase of digital decoders (OJ 2007 L 147, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.


(1)  OJ C 117, 29.5.2007


Top