This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007CN0509
Case C-509/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 21 November 2007 — Luigi Scarpelli v NEOS Banca SpA
Case C-509/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 21 November 2007 — Luigi Scarpelli v NEOS Banca SpA
Case C-509/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 21 November 2007 — Luigi Scarpelli v NEOS Banca SpA
SL C 37, 9.2.2008, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.2.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 37/7 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo (Italy) lodged on 21 November 2007 — Luigi Scarpelli v NEOS Banca SpA
(Case C-509/07)
(2008/C 37/08)
Language of the case: Italian
Referring court
Tribunale di Bergamo
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Luigi Scarpelli
Defendant: NEOS Banca SpA
Question referred
‘Is Article 11(2) of Council Directive 102/87/EEC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an agreement between a supplier and a grantor of credit whereunder credit is made available exclusively by that grantor of credit to customers of that supplier is a necessary condition for the consumer's right to pursue remedies against the grantor of credit — where the supplier is in breach of contract — even where that right is (a) only to termination of the credit agreement; or (b) to termination of the agreement and consequently to reimbursement of the sums paid to the grantor of credit?’
(1) OJ L 42, p. 48.