Case T-304/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Reber v OHIM — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Mozart) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark Mozart — Subject-matter of the dispute — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of legality — Article 7(1)(c), Article 51(1)(a), Article 73, first sentence, and Article 74(1), first phrase, of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

Case T-304/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Reber v OHIM — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Mozart) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark Mozart — Subject-matter of the dispute — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of legality — Article 7(1)(c), Article 51(1)(a), Article 73, first sentence, and Article 74(1), first phrase, of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

Case T-304/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 July 2008 — Reber v OHIM — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Mozart) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark Mozart — Subject-matter of the dispute — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Principle of legality — Article 7(1)(c), Article 51(1)(a), Article 73, first sentence, and Article 74(1), first phrase, of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

SL C 209, 15.8.2008, p. 48–48 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)