This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62006CO0057
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2007. # Elisabetta Righini v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Officials - Temporary staff - Classification by grade and step - Classification in a higher career bracket - Distortion of the facts - Defective statement of reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded. # Case C-57/06 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2007.
Elisabetta Righini v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Officials - Temporary staff - Classification by grade and step - Classification in a higher career bracket - Distortion of the facts - Defective statement of reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-57/06 P.
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 January 2007.
Elisabetta Righini v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Officials - Temporary staff - Classification by grade and step - Classification in a higher career bracket - Distortion of the facts - Defective statement of reasons - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
Case C-57/06 P.
Izvješća Suda EU-a 2007 I-00012*;FP-I-B-2-00003
Zbirke sudske prakse Suda Europske unije – Predmeti povezani s osobljem 2007 II-B-2-00015
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2007:65
ORDER OF THE COURT (Seventh Chamber)
26 January 2007
Case C-57/06 P
Elisabetta Righini
v
Commission of the European Communities
(Appeal – Officials – Temporary staff – Classification by grade and step – Classification in a higher career bracket – Distortion of the facts – Defective statement of reasons – Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Appeal: against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 15 November 2005 in Case T-145/04 Righini v Commission [2005] ECR-SC I-A-349 and II-1547 dismissing the action for annulment of the Commission’s decisions to classify the applicant on her entry into service in Grade A7/3 and, in so far as may be necessary, annulment of the decision of 21 January 2004 rejecting the applicant’s complaint.
Held: The appeal is dismissed. Mrs Righini is ordered to pay the costs.
Summary
1. Appeals – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts – Inadmissible – Review by the Court of the assessment of the evidence – Possible only where the clear sense f the evidence has been distorted
(Art. 225 EC; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)
2. Officials – Actions – Grounds – Burden of proof proving a fact alleged by the applicant resting with the applicant
3. Appeals – Grounds – Insufficient statement of reasons – Mere drafting error
4. Appeals – Grounds – Plea directed against a ground of the judgment not necessary to support its operative part – Plea inoperative