This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 61999CJ0182
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003. # Salzgitter AG v Commission of the European Communities. # Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams. # Case C-182/99 P.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003.
Salzgitter AG v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams.
Case C-182/99 P.
Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 2 October 2003.
Salzgitter AG v Commission of the European Communities.
Appeal - Agreements and concerted practices - European producers of beams.
Case C-182/99 P.
Izvješća Suda EU-a 2003 I-10761
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2003:526
«(Appeal – Agreements and concerted practices – European producers of beams)»
|
I - 0000 | |||
|
I - 0000 | |||
( ECSC Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 18 and 44; Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 32 and 33(1)
and (5))
(Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 49 and 65(b))
( Art. 32d(1) CS; ECSC Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 51)
( ECSC Treaty, Arts 15, first para., and 65(5))
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
2 October 2003 (1)
((Appeal – Agreements and concerted practices – European producers of beams))
In Case C-182/99 P, Salzgitter AG, formerly Preussag Stahl AG, established in Salzgitter (Germany), represented by H. Satzky and C. Frick, Rechtsanwälte, with an address for service in Luxembourg,appellant,
APPEAL against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 11 March 1999 in Case T-148/94 Preussag v Commission [1999] ECR II-613, seeking to have that judgment set aside in part, the other party to the proceedings being: Commission of the European Communities, represented by J. Currall and W. Wils, acting as Agents, assisted by H.-J. Freund, Rechtsanwalt, with an address for service in Luxembourg,defendant at first instance,THE COURT (Fifth Chamber),,
having regard to the Report for the Hearing,
after hearing oral argument from the parties at the hearing on 31 January 2002,after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 26 September 2002,
gives the following
On those grounds,
THE COURT (Fifth Chamber)
hereby:
Wathelet |
Edward |
La Pergola |
Jann |
von Bahr |
|
R. Grass |
M. Wathelet |
Registrar |
President of the Fifth Chamber |