Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CJ0116

    Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020.
    Gregor Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
    Case C-116/19 P.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:501

     Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 June 2020 –
    Schneider v EUIPO

    (Case C‑116/19 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal – Civil service – Temporary staff – Internal reorganisation of the services of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) – Reassignment – Legal basis – Article 7 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Interests of the service – Substantial changes in tasks – Qualification – Transfer – Change – Misuse of power – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Right to a fair hearing – Right to effective judicial protection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union)

    1. 

    Actions brought by officials – Grounds – Misuse of powers – Meaning – Decision in the interest of the service – No misuse of powers

    (see paras 49, 50)

    2. 

    Officials – Organisation of services – Staff allocation – Reassignment in the interest of the service – Right of the person concerned to be heard – Absence

    (Staff Regulations, Art. 7)

    (see para. 61)

    3. 

    Appeal – Grounds – Specific criticism of a point of the General Court’s reasoning necessary

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 169(2))

    (see para. 71)

    4. 

    Appeal – Grounds – Plea directed against a superfluous ground – Invalid plea in law – Rejection

    (Art. 256(1) TFEU)

    (see paras 76, 106)

    5. 

    Appeal – Grounds – Mistaken assessment of the facts – Inadmissible

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.)

    (see para. 97)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders Mr Gregor Schneider to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.

    Top