Keywords
Subject of the case
Operative part

Keywords

Appeals – Grounds – Plea submitted for the first time in the context of the appeal – Inadmissibility – Appeal against a judgment of the Court of First Instance in the sphere of competition (see paras 22-23, 25, 31)

2. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Turnover taken into account – Value of deliveries internal to the undertaking – Included (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2) (see para. 30)

3. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Division of the undertakings in question into categories with a specific starting point – Whether permissible (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2); Commission notice 98/C 9/03, point 1 A) (see paras 43, 45, 49, 56)

4. Appeals – Jurisdiction of the Court – Challenge on grounds of fairness to the Court of First Instance’s assessment concerning the amount of a fine imposed on an undertaking – Excluded – Review limited to ascertaining whether the General Court took into account all the factors essential to the assessment of the gravity of the infringement and all the arguments raised against the fine imposed (see paras 58-59)

Subject of the case

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-68/04 SGL Carbon v Commission , in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the application brought by the appellant for the annulment of Commission Decision 2004/420/EC of 3 December 2003 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement concerning an agreement in the market for electrical and mechanical carbon and graphite products or, in the alternative, an application for the reduction of the fine imposed on the appellant – Failure to take into consideration, by classifying it as a new and inadmissible complaint, the appellant’s argument concerning the taking into account of the value of the captive use in calculating the turnover and market shares of the undertakings concerned – Breach of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment.

Operative part

Operative part

The Court:

1. Dismisses the appeal;

2. Orders SGL Carbon AG to pay the costs.