Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62004CJ0195

    Summary of the Judgment

    Keywords
    Summary

    Keywords

    1. Actions for failure to fulfil obligations – Subject-matter of the dispute – Determination during the procedure prior to the action

    (Art. 226 EC)

    2. Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements

    (Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 38(1)(c))

    Summary

    1. Although it is true that the subject-matter of proceedings brought under Article 226 EC is circumscribed by the pre-litigation procedure provided for in that provision and that, consequently, the Commission’s reasoned opinion and the application must be based on the same objections, that requirement cannot go so far as to mean that in every case exactly the same wording must be used in both, where the subject-matter of the proceedings has not been extended or altered but simply narrowed. Accordingly, in its application the Commission may clarify its initial grounds of objection provided, however, that it does not alter the subject-matter of the dispute.

    (see para. 18)

    2. It is clear from Article 38(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, and from the case-law relating to that provision, that an application must state the subject-matter of the proceedings and a summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based, and that that statement must be sufficiently clear and precise to enable the defendant to prepare its defence and the Court to rule on the application. It is therefore necessary for the essential points of law and of fact on which a case is based to be indicated coherently and intelligibly in the application itself and for the heads of claim to be set out unambiguously so that the Court does not rule ultra petita or indeed fail to rule on an objection.

    (see para. 22)

    Top