Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2013:079:TOC

    Official Journal of the European Union, R 079, 16 March 2013


    Display all documents published in this Official Journal
     

    ISSN 1977-091X

    doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.079.eng

    Official Journal

    of the European Union

    C 79

    European flag  

    English edition

    Information and Notices

    Volume 56
    16 March 2013


    Notice No

    Contents

    page

     

    IV   Notices

     

    NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

     

    Court of Justice of the European Union

    2013/C 079/01

    Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 71, 9.3.2013

    1


     

    V   Announcements

     

    COURT PROCEEDINGS

     

    Court of Justice

    2013/C 079/02

    Case C-541/11: Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — Jožef Grilc v Slovensko zavarovalno združenje GIZ (Article 104(3), second subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure — Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles — Directive 2000/26/EC — Compensation bodies — Claim for compensation brought before a national court)

    2

    2013/C 079/03

    Case C-261/12 P: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 January 2013 — Annunziata Del Prete v Giorgio Armani SpA, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Reputation — Figurative sign ‘AJ AMICI JUNIOR’ — Opposition by the holder of the earlier national figurative mark AJ ARMANI JEANS and of the earlier national word mark ARMANI JUNIOR)

    2

    2013/C 079/04

    Case C-488/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Sándor Nagy v Hajdú-Bihar Megyei Kormányhivatal

    3

    2013/C 079/05

    Case C-489/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Lajos Tiborné Böszörményi (Debrecen, Hungary) v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal (Budapest, Hungary)

    3

    2013/C 079/06

    Case C-490/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Gálóczhi-Tömösváry Róbert v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

    3

    2013/C 079/07

    Case C-491/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 31 October 2012 — Magdolna Margit Szabadosné Bay v Mezőgazdasági és Vidékfejlesztési Hivatal

    4

    2013/C 079/08

    Case C-526/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Debreceni Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 20 November 2012 — Ványai Józsefné v Nagyrábé Község Polgármesteri Hivatal

    4

    2013/C 079/09

    Case C-574/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 7 December 2012 — Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, EPE, Serviço de Utilização Comum dos Hospitais (SUCH) v Eurest Portugal — Sociedade Europeia de Restaurantes Lda

    5

    2013/C 079/10

    Case C-577/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Finanzsenat, Außenstelle Wien (Austria), lodged on 10 December 2012 — Michaela Hopfgartner

    6

    2013/C 079/11

    Case C-588/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 14 December 2012 — Lyreco Belgium NV v Sophie Rogiers

    6

    2013/C 079/12

    Case C-592/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 18 December 2012 — Compañía Europea de Viajeros España, S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Madrid (Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda)

    6

    2013/C 079/13

    Case C-594/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verfassungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 December 2012 — Kärntner Landesregierung and Others

    7

    2013/C 079/14

    Case C-598/12: Action brought on 20 December 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

    8

    2013/C 079/15

    Case C-605/12: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 24 December 2012 — Welmory Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Gdańsku

    8

    2013/C 079/16

    Case C-14/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 10 January 2013 — Gena Ivanova Cholakova v Osmo rayonno upravlenie pri Stolichna direktsiya na vatreshnite raboti

    9

    2013/C 079/17

    Case C-18/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen Sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria) lodged on 14 January 2013 — ‘Maks Pen’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i izpalnenie na proizvodstvoto’ pri Tsentralno Upravlenie na Natsionalnata Agentsia po Prihodite — gr. Sofia

    10

    2013/C 079/18

    Case C-23/13: Action brought on 17 January 2013 — European Commission v French Republic

    11

    2013/C 079/19

    Case C-666/11: Order of the President of the Court of 7 January 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Germany)) — M, N, O, p, Q v Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge

    11

     

    General Court

    2013/C 079/20

    Case T-494/10: Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2013 — Bank Saderat Iran v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment)

    12

    2013/C 079/21

    Case T-540/10: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2013 — Spain v Commission (Cohesion Fund — Reduction of the financial assistance initially granted from the Cohesion Fund to four project stages concerning the construction of certain sections of the high-speed line linking Madrid and the French border — Time-limit for adopting a decision — Article H(2) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 — Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 — Additional works or services — Concept of ‘unforeseen circumstances’ — Article 20(2)(f) of Directive 93/38/EEC)

    13

    2013/C 079/22

    Case T-66/11: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2013 — Present-Service Ullrich v OHIM — Punt-Nou (babilu) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark babilu — Earlier Community word mark BABIDU — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the services — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    13

    2013/C 079/23

    Case T-104/11: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Ferrari v OHIM (PERLE') (Community trade mark — International registration designating the European Community — Figurative mark PERLE' — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Lack of distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    14

    2013/C 079/24

    Case T-159/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2013 — Marszałkowski v OHIM — Mar-Ko Fleischwaren (WALICHNOWY MARKO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark WALICHNOWY MARKO — Earlier Community word mark MAR-KO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    14

    2013/C 079/25

    Case T-235/11: Judgment of the General Court of of 31 January 2013 — Spain v Commission (Cohesion Fund — Reduction of the financial assistance initially granted by the Fund to five projects concerning the implementation of certain lines of the high-speed railway network in Spain — Time-limit for the adoption of a decision — Article H(2) of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 — Article 18(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1386/2002 — Additional deliveries — Additional works or services — Concept of ‘unforeseen circumstance’ — Article 20(2)(e) and (f) of Directive 93/38/EEC)

    14

    2013/C 079/26

    Case T-263/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Bopp v OHIM (Representation of a green octagonal frame) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark representing a green octagonal frame — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Offer of evidence submitted for the first time in the reply — Article 48(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Document sent to OHIM by fax — Applicable rules)

    15

    2013/C 079/27

    Case T-272/11: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Coin v OHIM — Dynamiki Zoi (Fitcoin) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin — Earlier national, Community and international figurative marks coin — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    15

    2013/C 079/28

    Case T-368/11: Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and Others v Commission (REACH — Transitional measures concerning the restrictions on the placing on the market and use of acrylamide for grouting applications — Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)

    16

    2013/C 079/29

    Case T-412/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)

    16

    2013/C 079/30

    Case T-426/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (MÉDITATION TRANSCENDANTALE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark MÉDITATION TRANSCENDANTALE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)

    17

    2013/C 079/31

    Case T-504/11: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2013 — Hartmann v OHIM — Protecsom (DIGNITUDE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE — Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    17

    2013/C 079/32

    Case T-54/12: Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2013 — K2 Sports Europe v OHIM — Karhu Sport Iberica (SPORT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark SPORT — Earlier national and international word marks K2 SPORTS — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    18

    2013/C 079/33

    Case T-560/12: Action brought on 17 December 2012 — Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v European Chemicals Agency

    18

    2013/C 079/34

    Case T-572/12: Action brought on 21 December 2012 — Nissan Jidosha/OHIM (CVTC)

    19

    2013/C 079/35

    Case T-577/12: Action brought on 27 December 2012 — NIOC and Others v Council

    19

    2013/C 079/36

    Case T-578/12: Action brought on 27 December 2012 — NIOC v Council

    20

    2013/C 079/37

    Case T-580/12: Action brought on 27 December 2012 — Yaqub/OHIM — Turkey (ATATURK)

    21

    2013/C 079/38

    Case T-2/13: Action brought on 7 January 2013 — CFE-CGC France Télécom-Orange v Commission

    21

    2013/C 079/39

    Case T-3/13: Action brought on 7 January 2013 — Ronja v Commission

    22

    2013/C 079/40

    Case T-7/13: Action brought on 7 January 2013 — ADEAS v Commission

    22

    2013/C 079/41

    Case T-9/13: Action brought on 8 January 2013 — National Iranian Gas Company v Council

    23

    2013/C 079/42

    Case T-10/13: Action brought on 9 January 2013 — Bank of Industry and Mine v Council

    24

    2013/C 079/43

    Case T-17/13: Action brought on 11 January 2013 — ANKO v Commission

    24

    2013/C 079/44

    Case T-19/13: Action brought on 11 January 2013 — Ekologický právní servis v Commission

    25

    2013/C 079/45

    Case T-28/13: Action brought on 23 January 2013 — ECC Couture v OHIM — Ball Wholesale (Culture)

    26

    2013/C 079/46

    Case T-29/13: Action brought on 17 January 2013 — AbbVie e.a. v EMA

    26

    2013/C 079/47

    Case T-30/13: Action brought on 22 January 2013 — GRE v OHIM — Villiger Söhne (LIBERTE american blend)

    27

    2013/C 079/48

    Case T-34/13: Action brought on 23 January 2013 — Meta Group v European Commission

    27

    2013/C 079/49

    Case T-35/13: Action brought on 23 January 2013 — Meta Group v European Commission

    29

    2013/C 079/50

    Case T-36/13: Action brought on 21 January 2013 — Erreà Sport v OHIM — Facchinelli (ANTONIO BACIONE)

    29

    2013/C 079/51

    Case T-42/13: Action brought on 28 January 2013 — 1. garantovaná v Commission

    30

    2013/C 079/52

    Case T-43/13: Action brought on 29 January 2013 — Donnici v Parliament

    31

    2013/C 079/53

    Case T-44/13: Action brought on 29 January 2013 — AbbVie v EMA

    31

     

    European Union Civil Service Tribunal

    2013/C 079/54

    Case F-27/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 15 January 2013 — BO v Commission (Staff case — Social security — Payment of transport costs connected to medical care — Transport costs incurred for linguistic reasons)

    33

    2013/C 079/55

    Case F-25/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 February 2013 — Presset v Commission (Civil Service — Remuneration — Daily subsistence allowance — Condition for granting)

    33

    2013/C 079/56

    Case F-1/13: Action brought on 3 January 2013 — ZZ v Europol

    33


    EN

     

    Top