Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2007/129/34

    Case T-106/07: Action brought on 11 April 2007 — Alcon v OHIM — *Acri.Tec (BioVisc)

    SL C 129, 9.6.2007, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    09/06/2007; Uvodna izjava
    Author:
    Sud prvog stupnja
    Form:
    Pravosudna informacija

    9.6.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 129/19

    Action brought on 11 April 2007 — Alcon v OHIM — *Acri.Tec (BioVisc)

    (Case T-106/07)

    (2007/C 129/34)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Alcon, Inc. (Hünenberg, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte (Hennigsdorf, Germany)

    Form of order sought

    —

    The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 February 2007 in Case R 660/2006-2 Alcon, Inc. v. OHIM (BioVisc) be annulled insofar as it dismissed the opposition of Alcon, Inc. against CTM application 3 651 809 ‘BioVisc’;

    —

    the Office for Harmonisation be ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for the Community trade mark: *Acri.Tec AG Gesellschaft für ophthalmologische Produkte

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BioVisc ’for goods in class 5 — application No 3 651 809

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

    Mark or sign cited: The Community and international word marks ‘PROVISC ’and ‘DUOVISC ’for goods in class 5

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision and rejection of the opposition in its entirety

    Pleas in law: The trade marks in question are confusingly similar and the goods applied for are identical to those covered by the opposition trade marks.

    Top