Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document C2006/326/164

    Case T-341/06: Action brought on 1 December 2006 — Compagnie générale de Diététique v OHIM (GARUM)

    SL C 326, 30.12.2006, p. 81–81 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    30/12/2006; Uvodna izjava
    Author:
    Sud prvog stupnja
    Form:
    Pravosudna informacija

    30.12.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 326/81

    Action brought on 1 December 2006 — Compagnie générale de Diététique v OHIM (GARUM)

    (Case T-341/06)

    (2006/C 326/164)

    Language in which the application was lodged: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Compagnie générale de Diététique SAS (Caen, France) (represented by: J.-J. Evrard and T. de Haan, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GARUM’ for goods in Class 29 (application No 3501939)

    Decision of the Examiner: Refusal of the application

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 (1) in that, contrary to the finding by the Board of Appeal of OHIM in the contested decision, its mark is not descriptive in relation to the goods designated and having regard to the relevant public.

    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

    Top