Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2006/010/38

    Case T-275/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 November 2005 — Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Hi-FOCuS — Earlier national word mark FOCUS — Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal — Assessment of evidence produced before the Board of Appeal)

    SL C 10, 14.1.2006, p. 19–20 (ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.1.2006   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 10/19


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 November 2005 — Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH v OHIM

    (Case T-275/03) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Hi-FOCuS - Earlier national word mark FOCUS - Scope of the examination conducted by the Board of Appeal - Assessment of evidence produced before the Board of Appeal)

    (2006/C 10/38)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant(s): Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: U. Gürtler, lawyer)

    Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, B. Müller and G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

    Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: ECI Telecom Ltd (Petah Tikva, Israel)

    Application for

    ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 April 2003 (Case R 913/2001-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH and ECI Telecom Ltd,

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 April 2003 (Case R 913/2001-4);

    2.

    Orders the defendant to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.


    Top