This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2005/093/51
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Likelihood of confusion — Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF — Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Likelihood of confusion — Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF — Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Likelihood of confusion — Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF — Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
SL C 93, 16.4.2005, p. 26–26
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 16/04/2005; Uvodna izjava
- Author:
- Sud prvog stupnja
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Link
- Link
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Link
|
16.4.2005 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 93/26 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 15 February 2005
in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition - Likelihood of confusion - Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF - Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
(2005/C 93/51)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-296/02: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, established in Neckarsulm (Germany), represented by P. Groß, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, B. Müller and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being REWE-Zentral AG, established in Cologne (Germany), represented by M. Kinkeldey, lawyer — action against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2002 (Case R 0036/2002-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and REWE-Zentral AG — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 February 2005, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
