This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TJ0250
Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 December 2022.#Tradición CZ, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. – Earlier EU word mark RIVERO CZ – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-250/19.
Presuda Općeg suda (prvo vijeće) od 21. prosinca 2022.
Tradición CZ, SL protiv Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo.
Žig Europske unije – Postupak povodom prigovora – Prijava verbalnog žiga Europske unije TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. – Raniji verbalni žig Europske unije RIVERO CZ – Relativni razlog za odbijanje – Nepostojanje vjerojatnosti dovođenja u zabludu – Članak 8. stavak 1. točka (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 207/2009 (koji je postao članak 8. stavak 1. točka (b) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001).
Predmet T-250/19.
Presuda Općeg suda (prvo vijeće) od 21. prosinca 2022.
Tradición CZ, SL protiv Ureda Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo.
Žig Europske unije – Postupak povodom prigovora – Prijava verbalnog žiga Europske unije TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. – Raniji verbalni žig Europske unije RIVERO CZ – Relativni razlog za odbijanje – Nepostojanje vjerojatnosti dovođenja u zabludu – Članak 8. stavak 1. točka (b) Uredbe (EU) br. 207/2009 (koji je postao članak 8. stavak 1. točka (b) Uredbe (EU) 2017/1001).
Predmet T-250/19.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:838
- Date of document:
- 21/12/2022
- Date lodged:
- 15/04/2019
- Author:
- Opći sud
- Country or organisation from which the request originates:
- Španjolska
- Form:
- Presuda
- Authentic language:
- španjolski
- Type of procedure:
- Tužba za poništenje - zahtjev usvojen, Tužba za poništenje - odbijanje zbog neosnovanosti
- Applicant:
- Građanin
- Defendant:
- Ured Europske unije za intelektualno vlasništvo, Institucije i tijela EU-a
- Judge-Rapporteur:
- Gâlea
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Affected by case:
-
- Related judicial information 62019TA0250
- Instruments cited in case law:
-
- 12008E263: N 1
- 32009R0207-A65P2: N 18
- 32009R0207: N 21
- 32009R0207-A08P1LB: N 6 22 23
- 32017R1001-A72P2: N 18
- 32017R1001-A08P1LB: N 22 27 29
- 32017R1001: N 6 21
- 61995CJ0251-N24: N 87
- 61997CJ0039-N17: N 86
- 61997CJ0039-N18: N 87
- 61997CJ0342-N20: N 87
- 61997CJ0342-N26: N 96
- 62001TJ0162-N30: N 28
- 62001TJ0162-N31: N 28
- 62001TJ0162-N32: N 28
- 62001TJ0162-N33: N 28
- 62003TJ0081-N74: N 86
- 62004TJ0256-N42: N 30
- 62005CJ0334-N35: N 46
- 62005CJ0334-N41: N 47
- 62005CJ0334-N42: N 51
- 62006CJ0193-N43: N 51 52
- 62007TJ0316-N42: N 29
- 62009TJ0138-N43: N 42
- 62009TJ0138-N42: N 44
- 62010TJ0209-N22: N 60
- 62011TJ0249-N21: N 33
- 62012CJ0591-N12: N 21
- 62012CO0268-N31: N 19
- 62012CO0268-N32: N 19
- 62012CO0268-N33: N 19
- 62012CO0268-N34: N 19
- 62013TJ0715: N 45
- 62015CJ0482-N27: N 18
- 62015CJ0482-N30: N 20
- 62016TJ0189-N49: N 71
- 62016TJ0382-N64: N 62
- 62017TJ0703-N49: N 60
- 62017TO0234-N38: N 50
- 62018CJ0702-N2: N 21
- 62021TJ0099-N89: N 61
- 62021TJ0219-N117: N 83
- 62021TJ0445-N49: N 73
- Subject matter:
- Case law directory code:
-
