Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0081

    Case T-81/13: Action brought on 12 February 2013 — FTI Touristik v OHIM (BigXtra)

    SL C 108, 13.4.2013, p. 32–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    13.4.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 108/32


    Action brought on 12 February 2013 — FTI Touristik v OHIM (BigXtra)

    (Case T-81/13)

    2013/C 108/80

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by A. Parr, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 November 2012 in Case R 2521/12011-1;

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘BigXtra’ for goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 39, 41, 42 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 925 868

    Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009


    Top