Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62013TN0078

    Case T-78/13: Action brought on 7 February 2013 — Red Bull/OHIM — Sun Mark (BULLDOG)

    SL C 108, 13.4.2013, p. 31–32 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    07/02/2013
    Date lodged:
    07/02/2013
    Author:
    Opći sud
    Form:
    Pravosudna informacija
    Authentic language:
    engleski
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    13.4.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 108/31

    Action brought on 7 February 2013 — Red Bull/OHIM — Sun Mark (BULLDOG)

    (Case T-78/13)

    2013/C 108/79

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck and I. Fowler, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sun Mark Ltd (Middlesex, United Kingdom)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 November 2012 in Case R 0107/2012-2; and

    —

    Order that the costs of the proceedings be borne by the defendant and by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal if they join as intervener.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BULLDOG’, for goods in classes 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 9 215 567

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and international trade mark registrations of the word mark ‘BULL’ and ‘RED BULL’ for goods in classes 32 and 33

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and (5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

    Top