Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62012TN0369

Case T-369/12: Action brought on 20 August 2012 — American Express Marketing & Development v OHIM (EUROPE IP ZONE)

SL C 319, 20.10.2012, p. 13–13 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

Date of document:
20/08/2012
Date lodged:
20/08/2012
Author:
Opći sud
Form:
Pravosudna informacija
Authentic language:
engleski
Link
Select all documents mentioning this document
Instruments cited in case law:
Link

20.10.2012   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/13

Action brought on 20 August 2012 — American Express Marketing & Development v OHIM (EUROPE IP ZONE)

(Case T-369/12)

2012/C 319/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: American Express Marketing & Development Corp. (New York, United States) (represented by: V. Spitz, A. Gaul, T. Golda, and S. Kirschstein-Freund, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 June 2012 in case R 1451/2011-2;

—

In the alternative, amend the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 June 2012 in case R 1451/2011-2, and rule that the appeal is justified; and

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings and of the proceedings before the Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EUROPE IP ZONE’ for services in class 42 — Community trade mark application No 9488032

Decision of the Examiner: Rejected the CTM application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.

Top