This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TN0170
Case T-170/12: Action brought on 10 April 2012 — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE)
Case T-170/12: Action brought on 10 April 2012 — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE)
Case T-170/12: Action brought on 10 April 2012 — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE)
SL C 194, 30.6.2012, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
30.6.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 194/23 |
Action brought on 10 April 2012 — Beyond Retro v OHIM — S&K Garments (BEYOND VINTAGE)
(Case T-170/12)
2012/C 194/39
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Beyond Retro Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: S&K Garments, Inc. (New York, United States)
Form of order sought
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2012 joined cases R 493/2011-4 and R 548/2011-4; and |
— |
Order the Office and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: International Registration of the word mark ‘BEYOND VINTAGE’, for goods and services in classes 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No W 994046
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 5629035 of the word mark ‘BEYOND RETRO’, for goods and services in classes 25 AND 35
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the applicant’s appeal in case R 548/2011-4 and annulled the decision of the opposition division in case R 493/2011-4
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.