This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TJ0403
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011. # Brighton Collectibles, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON - National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009. # Case T-403/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011.
Brighton Collectibles, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON - National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-403/10.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011.
Brighton Collectibles, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON - National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-403/10.
Izvješća Suda EU-a 2011 II-00325*
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:538
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 September 2011 – Brighton Collectibles v OHIM – Felmar (BRIGHTON)
(Case T-403/10)
Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark BRIGHTON – National word and figurative marks BRIGHTON and earlier signs BRIGHTON – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 44-47)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2010 (Case R 408/2009-4) concerning an opposition procedure between Brighton Collectibles Inc. and Felmar. |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Brighton Collectibles Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
3. |
Orders Felmar to bear its own costs. |