This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FB0021
Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
Case F-21/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Action for damages — Illegality — Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case — Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law — Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
SL C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.5.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/28 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 March 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case F-21/10) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Action for damages - Illegality - Letter concerning the costs of a case sent to the lawyer who represented the applicant in the case - Action manifestly devoid of any basis in law - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure)
(2012/C 138/59)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s request for compensation for the fact that the defendant sent a letter concerning the applicant to a lawyer who no longer represented him.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly devoid of any basis in law. |
2. |
Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay all the costs. |
3. |
Mr Marcuccio is ordered to pay to the Tribunal the sum of EUR 2 000. |