EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009FB0071
Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)
Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)
Case F-71/09: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Action manifestly unfounded — Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 — Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations — Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Classification — Multiplication factor — Promotion points)
SL C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 28–28
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 12/05/2011
- Date lodged:
- 14/08/2009
- Author:
- Službenički sud
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Authentic language:
- francuski
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
12.5.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 138/28 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 12 May 2011 — Caminiti v Commission
(Case F-71/09) (1)
(Staff case - Officials - Action manifestly unfounded - Entry into force of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 - Articles 44 and 46 of the Staff Regulations - Article 7 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Classification - Multiplication factor - Promotion points)
(2012/C 138/58)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Paolo Caminiti (Tubize, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents)
Re:
Application to annul the defendant’s decision to classify the applicant in Grade AST 9, step 4, with a multiplication factor equal to 1 and, consequently, the reinstatement of the applicant in Grade AST 9, step 2, retaining a multiplication factor of 1,071151.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly without foundation in law. |
|
2. |
Mr Caminiti is ordered to refund to the Civil Service Tribunal the sum of EUR 500 under Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure. |
|
3. |
Mr Caminiti shall bear his own costs and is ordered to pay the costs incurred by the Commission. |
