This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TA0051
Case T-51/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission (Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Sugar originating from Croatia — Article 220(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Notice to importers published in the Official Journal — Good faith)
Case T-51/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission (Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Sugar originating from Croatia — Article 220(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Notice to importers published in the Official Journal — Good faith)
Case T-51/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission (Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Sugar originating from Croatia — Article 220(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Notice to importers published in the Official Journal — Good faith)
SL C 301, 22.11.2008, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/10/2008
- Date lodged:
- 22/02/2007
- Author:
- Sud prvog stupnja
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
- Authentic language:
- njemački
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
22.11.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 301/33 |
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 October 2008 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission
(Case T-51/07) (1)
(Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Sugar originating from Croatia - Article 220(2)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Notice to importers published in the Official Journal - Good faith)
(2008/C 301/53)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH (St. Andrä im Lavanttal, Austria) (represented by: U. Schrömbges and O. Wenzlaff, lawyers)
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and S. Schønberg, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
ACTION for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2006) 5789 final of 4 December 2006.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH to bear the costs. |
