This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007FN0009
Case F-9/07: Action brought on 5 February 2007 — Angé Serrano v Parliament
Case F-9/07: Action brought on 5 February 2007 — Angé Serrano v Parliament
Case F-9/07: Action brought on 5 February 2007 — Angé Serrano v Parliament
SL C 69, 24.3.2007, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 05/02/2005
- Author:
- Službenički sud
- Form:
- Pravosudna informacija
|
24.3.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 69/31 |
Action brought on 5 February 2007 — Angé Serrano v Parliament
(Case F-9/07)
(2007/C 69/62)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Pilar Angé Serrano (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
|
— |
Annul the decision of the European Parliament of 20 March 2006 to reclassify the applicant in Grade B*6, step 8, with effect from 1 May 2004; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay, by way of compensation for material and non-material damage and harm to the applicant's career, the sum of EUR 25 000, subject to increase and/or decrease in the course of the proceedings; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant, an official of the European Parliament and successful candidate in a competition for change of category (from Category C to Category B) before the reformed Staff Regulations entered into force on 1 May 2004, has already brought an action before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities against the decision to reclassify her in Grade B*5 (1).
In the present case, the applicant challenges the Parliament's decision of 20 March 2006 to reclassify her in Grade B*6, step 8. In support of her claim, the applicant relies on pleas in law which are very similar to those put forward in Case T-47/05. Moreover, she submits that, despite her new classification, the system arising from the reform of the Staff Regulations calls into question the effectiveness of her change of category from C to B, since the new classification does not confer any benefit on the applicant when her situation is compared with that of her colleagues who have not been successful in a competition for change of category.
(1) Case T-47/05 Angé Serrano and Others v Parliament, OJ C 93, 14.4.2005, p. 36.
