ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.340.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 340

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 54
19 November 2011

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2011/C 340/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 331, 12.11.2011

1

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2011/C 340/02

Case C-520/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Arkema SA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — European market for monochloroacetic acid — Rules on imputing a subsidiary’s anti-competitive practices to its parent company — Presumption of the actual exercise of a decisive influence — Obligation to state reasons)

2

2011/C 340/03

Case C-521/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Market for monochloroacetic acid — Rules on imputing a subsidiary’s anti-competitive practices to its parent company — Presumption of the actual exercise of a decisive influence — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons)

2

2011/C 340/04

Case C-82/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 73/239/EEC — Articles 6, 8, 9, 13 and 15 to 17 — Directive 92/49/EEC — Articles 22 and 23 — Direct insurance other than life assurance — Amendment of statutes of an insurance body as regards its capacity — Non-application of the European Union insurance legislation in respect of insurance other than life assurance)

3

2011/C 340/05

Case C-187/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — Baris Unal v Staatssecretaris van Justitie (EEC-Turkey Association Agreement — Decision No 1/80 of the Association Council — Article 6(1), first indent — Turkish national — Residence permit — Family reunification — Separation of the partners — Withdrawal of the residence permit — Retroactive effect)

3

2011/C 340/06

Case C-387/10: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Freedom to provide services — Legislation of a Member State concerning investment funds and real property investment funds — Evidence relating to revenue regarded as distributed — Evidence provided by way of a tax representative — ‘National’ financial institutions and business trustees recognised as tax representatives)

4

2011/C 340/07

Joined Cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. zoo v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Refusal to register signs ‘350’, ‘250’, ‘150’, ‘222’, ‘333’ and ‘555’ as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Descriptive character — Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice)

4

2011/C 340/08

Case C-56/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative marks 100 and 300 — Refusal of registration — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 38(2) — Disclaimer of any exclusive right to a non-distinctive element of a trade mark applied for)

5

2011/C 340/09

Case C-521/10 P: Order of the Court of 22 June 2011 — Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL v European Commission (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Alleged infringements of the provisions of European Union law relating to competition — Application seeking to require the Commission to initiate proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil obligations)

5

2011/C 340/10

Case C-144/11: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Mestre — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Asad Abdallah (Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the factual context of the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)

5

2011/C 340/11

Case C-421/11 P: Appeal brought on 11 August 2011 by Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA against the judgment delivered on 7 June 2011 in Case T-206/06 Total SA and Elf Aquitaine SA v Commission

6

2011/C 340/12

Case C-433/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovak Republic) lodged on 22 August 2011 — SKP v Kveta Polhošová

7

2011/C 340/13

Case C-435/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 26 August 2011 — CHS Tour Services GmbH v Team 4 Travel GmbH

8

2011/C 340/14

Case C-445/11 P: Appeal brought on 31 August 2011 by Bavaria NV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 16 June 2011 in Case T-235/07 Bavaria NV v European Commission

8

2011/C 340/15

Case C-452/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2011 by Heineken Nederland BV and Heineken NV against the judgment delivered by the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) on 16 June 2011 in Case T-240/07 Heineken Nederland BV and Heineken NV v European Commission

9

2011/C 340/16

Case C-453/11 P: Appeal brought on 2 September 2011 by Timehouse GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 6 July 2011 in Case T-235/10 Timehouse GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

10

2011/C 340/17

Case C-461/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 2 September 2011 — Ulf Kazimierz Radziejewski v Kronofogdemyndigheten i Stockholm

10

2011/C 340/18

Case C-464/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo — Sezione Distaccata di Bagheria (Italy) lodged on 7 September 2011 — Paola Galioto v Maria Guccione and Others

10

2011/C 340/19

Case C-468/11: Action brought on 13 September 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

11

2011/C 340/20

Case C-476/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 19 September 2011 — HK Danmark acting on behalf of Glennie Kristensen v Experian A/S

11

2011/C 340/21

Case C-497/11 P: Appeal brought on 27 September 2011 by the Hellenic Republic against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-81/09 Hellenic Republic v Commission

12

2011/C 340/22

Case C-508/11 P: Appeal brought on 3 October 2011 by ENI SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-39/07 ENI v Commission

12

2011/C 340/23

Case C-511/11 P: Appeal brought on 4 October 2011 by Polimeri Europa SpA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-59/07 Polimeri Europa v Commission

13

2011/C 340/24

Case C-346/10: Order of the President of the Court of 4 August 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Greece

14

2011/C 340/25

Case C-597/10: Order of the President of the Court of 8 August 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

14

2011/C 340/26

Case C-151/11: Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany)) — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel

14

General Court

2011/C 340/27

Case T-11/06: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Romana Tabacchi v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Participation in the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Equal treatment — Power of unlimited jurisdiction)

15

2011/C 340/28

Case T-19/06: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Mindo v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Payment of the fine by the jointly and severally liable debtor — Applicant involved in an insolvency procedure in the course of the proceedings — No longer any interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

15

2011/C 340/29

Case T-39/06: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Transcatab v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market-sharing — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Proportionality — Gravity and duration of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Cooperation)

15

2011/C 340/30

Case T-488/08: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Galileo International Technology v OHIM — Galileo Sistemas y Servicios (GSS GALILEO SISTEMAS Y SERVICIOS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ‘GSS GALILEO SISTEMAS Y SERVICIOS’ — Earlier Community word marks ‘GALILEO’ — Earlier Community figurative mark ‘powered by Galileo’ — Earlier Community figurative marks ‘GALILEO INTERNATIONAL’ — Relative ground for refusal — Lack of likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

16

2011/C 340/31

Case T-508/08: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Bang & Olufsen v OHIM (Representation of a loudspeaker) (Community trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional Community trade mark — Representation of a loudspeaker — Compliance by OHIM with a judgment annulling a decision of one of its Boards of Appeal — Article 63(6) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign which consists exclusively of the shape which gives substantial value to the goods — Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 207/2009))

16

2011/C 340/32

Case T-118/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — La Sonrisa de Carmen and Bloom Clothes v OHIM — Heldmann (BLOOMCLOTHES) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BLOOMCLOTHES — Earlier national word mark BLOOM — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

17

2011/C 340/33

Case T-425/09: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Honda Motor v OHIM — Blok (BLAST) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark BLAST — Earlier Community and Benelux word marks BLAST — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Weak distinctive character of the earlier marks)

17

2011/C 340/34

Case T-526/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — PAKI Logistics v OHIM (PAKI) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark PAKI — Absolute ground for refusal — Trade mark contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/209)

17

2011/C 340/35

Case T-176/10: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Seven v OHIM — Seven For All Mankind (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND — Earlier Community and international figurative marks containing the word element ‘seven’ — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18

2011/C 340/36

Case T-208/10: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2011 — Cree v OHIM (TRUEWHITE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRUEWHITE — Absolute grounds for refusal — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Descriptive mark)

18

2011/C 340/37

Case T-246/10: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Industrias Francisco Ivars v OHIM — Motive (Mechanical speed reducer) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a mechanical speed reducer — Earlier Community design — Ground of invalidity — No individual character — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

19

2011/C 340/38

Case T-247/10: Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — medi v OHIM — Deutsche Medien Center (deutschemedi.de) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark deutschemedi.de — Earlier Community word mark World of medi, earlier national figurative and word marks medi.eu, medi welt, medi-Verband and medi, and earlier trading name and company name medi — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2011/C 340/39

Case T-421/10: Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA DE CASTRO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO — Earlier national word mark ROSALIA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Assessment of the conceptual similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19

2011/C 340/40

Case T-94/05 RENV II: Order of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — Athinaïki Techniki v Commission (State aid — Complaint — Decision to take no further action on the complaint — Referral back to the General Court after setting aside — No need to adjudicate)

20

2011/C 340/41

Case T-141/05 RENV: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to contract LIEN 97/2011 — Refusal of access — Fresh examination in the course of proceedings — Bringing of a separate action — Disappearance of the interest in bringing proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

20

2011/C 340/42

Case T-195/09: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2011 — Matkompaniet v OHIM — DF World of Spices (KATOZ) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

20

2011/C 340/43

Case T-473/09: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2011 — Matkompaniet v OHIM — DF World of Spices (KATOZ) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)

21

2011/C 340/44

Case T-1/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — PPG and SNF v ECHA (Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility)

21

2011/C 340/45

Case T-267/10: Order of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — Land Wien v Commission (Nuclear power — Application initiating proceedings — Action for annulment — Decision of the Commission not to take any further action in respect of a complaint concerning the project for extension of blocks of a nuclear power plant — Action for a declaration of failure to act — Failure by the Commission to send all documents requested relevant to that project — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court — Inadmissibility)

22

2011/C 340/46

Case T-268/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — PPG and SNF v ECHA (Actions for annulment — REACH — Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern — Time-limit for bringing an action — Inadmissibility)

22

2011/C 340/47

Case T-343/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — Etimine and Etiproducts v ECHA (Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)

22

2011/C 340/48

Case T-346/10: Order of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — Borax Europe v ECHA (Action for annulment — REACH — Identification of boric acid and disodium tetraborate, anhydrous as substances of very high concern — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)

23

2011/C 340/49

Case T-193/11: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire — Actions for annulment — Inaction by the applicant — No need to adjudicate)

23

2011/C 340/50

Case T-194/11: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Bro Grébé v Council (Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken with regard to the situation in Côte d'Ivoire — Action for annulment — Inaction of the applicant — No need to adjudicate)

24

2011/C 340/51

Case T-317/10 P: Appeal brought on 18 July 2011 by L against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 7 July 2010 in Joined Cases F-116/07, F-13/08 and F-31/08 L v European Parliament

24

2011/C 340/52

Case T-461/11: Action brought on 22 August 2011 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Menard (natura)

25

2011/C 340/53

Case T-478/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — France v Commission

25

2011/C 340/54

Case T-479/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — France v Commission

26

2011/C 340/55

Case T-480/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Technion — Israel Institute of Technology and Technion Research & Development v Commission

27

2011/C 340/56

Case T-486/11: Action brought on 2 September 2011 — Telekomunikacja Polska v Commission

27

2011/C 340/57

Case T-487/11: Action brought on 9 September 2011 — Banco Privado Português, S.A. and Massa insolvente do Banco Privado Português v Commission

28

2011/C 340/58

Case T-496/11: Action brought on 15 September 2011 — United Kingdom v ECB

29

2011/C 340/59

Case T-502/11: Action brought on 26 September 2011 — Sanofi Pasteur MSD v OHIM — Mundipharma (Representation of a device of crossing sickles)

30

2011/C 340/60

Case T-504/11: Action brought on 27 September 2011 — Hartmann v OHIM — Protecsom (DIGNITUDE)

31

2011/C 340/61

Case T-509/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — Makhlouf v Council

31

2011/C 340/62

Case T-511/11: Action brought on 26 September 2011 — France v Commission

31

2011/C 340/63

Case T-368/07: Order of the General Court of 19 September 2011 — Lithuania v Commission

32

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2011/C 340/64

Case F-8/05 REV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Fouwels and Others v Commission (Staff case — Procedure — Application for revision — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal — Decision of the Tribunal — Application for revision of an order removing a case from the register following discontinuance — No binding effect — Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)

33

2011/C 340/65

Case F-23/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Abad-Villanueva and Others v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 — Candidates appearing on reserve lists before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Maintenance of the multiplicaton factor — Loss of promotion points)

33

2011/C 340/66

Case F-29/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Arnaldos Rosauro and Others v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 — Candidates appearing on reserve lists before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 — Loss of promotion points)

34

2011/C 340/67

Case F-31/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Pino v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 — Candidate appearing on the reserve list before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 — Loss of promotion points)

34

2011/C 340/68

Case F-45/06 REV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — De Buggenoms and Others v Commission (Civil Service — Procedure — Application for revision — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal — Decision of the Tribunal — Application for revision relating to an order for removal from the register following withdrawal from the proceedings — Res judicata — Absence — Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)

34

2011/C 340/69

Case F-103/06 REV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Saintraint v Commission (Staff case — Procedure — Application for revision — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal — Decision of the Tribunal — Application for revision of an order removing a case from the register following discontinuance — No binding effect — Inadmissibility raised by the Tribunal of its own motion)

35

2011/C 340/70

Case F-9/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Angé Serrano v Parliament (Civil Service — Officials — Change of category under the old Staff Regulations — Transitional rules for grading as at 1 May 2004 — Decision of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 13 February 2006 — Reclassification on the basis of the salary of officials receiving a compensatory payment — Applicable multiplier — Loss of promotion points — Claim for compensation)

35

2011/C 340/71

Case F-98/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Sarah Whitehead v European Central Bank (Civil service — Staff of the ECB — Annual salary and bonus review — 2008 review — Annual assessment — Criteria for assessment — Staff Committee consultation — Taking account of periods of sick leave — Setting of objectives)

36

2011/C 340/72

Case F-101/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — AA v Commission (Staff cases — Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Classification in grade — Implementation of a judgment — Loss of opportunity)

36

2011/C 340/73

Case F-13/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — De Nicola v EIB (Staff cases — Staff of the European Investment Bank — Assessment — Promotion — Action for damages — Admissibility)

37

2011/C 340/74

Case F-68/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — Behnke v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — 2009 appraisal and promotion exercise — Statement of reasons of the opinion of the Joint Appraisal and Promotion Committee — Manifest error of assessment)

37

2011/C 340/75

Case F-117/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 September 2011 — Van Soest v Commission (Civil Service — Recruitment — Competition — Conditions for admission — Required qualification — Concept of a diploma attesting to a level of secondary education and giving access to post-secondary education — Decisions of the selection board for a competition — Nature of the review exercised by the appointing authority)

37

2011/C 340/76

Case F-65/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Pereira Sequeira v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 — Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Articles 5(4) and 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Secretarial allowance — Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

38

2011/C 340/77

Case F-66/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Kyriazi v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 — Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Articles 5(4) and 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Secretarial allowance — Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

38

2011/C 340/78

Case F-105/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Lübking and Others v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Promotion — 2005 promotion exercise — New career structure — Extension of career by the introduction of new grades with no equivalents in the old Staff Regulations — Application of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations and the GIP applicable with effect from 2005 — Principle of equal treatment — Retroactive effect of promotion decisions to a date prior to 1 May 2004 — Transitional measures — Action manifestly bound to fail)

38

2011/C 340/79

Case F-42/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Prieto v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 — Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Articles 5(4) and 13(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Secretarial allowance — Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

39

2011/C 340/80

Case F-75/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Brown and Volpato v Commission (Staff Cases — Officials — Promotion — 2006 promotion year — New career structures — Extension of careers by the introduction of new grades having no equivalent in the old Staff Regulations — Application of Article 45 and Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations, as well as the general implementing provisions applicable from 2005 — Principle of equal treatment — Retroactive effect of promotion decisions to a date prior to 1 May 2004 — Transitional measures — Action which must manifestly be dismissed)

39

2011/C 340/81

Case F-82/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 27 September 2011 — Dittert v Commission (Staff Cases — Officials — Promotion — 2006 promotion year — New career structures — Extension of careers by the introduction of new grades having no equivalent in the old Staff Regulations — Application of Article 45 and Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations, as well as the general implementing provisions applicable from 2005 — Principle of equal treatment — Retroactive effect of promotion decisions to a date prior to 1 May 2004 — Transitional measures — Action which must manifestly be dismissed)

40

2011/C 340/82

Case F-6/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — M v EMA (Civil service — Action for damages — Action manifestly inadmissible)

40

2011/C 340/83

Case F-77/11: Action brought on 1 August 2011 — ZZ v Council

40

2011/C 340/84

Case F-81/11: Action brought on 8 August 2011 — ZZ v EASA

41

2011/C 340/85

Case F-82/11: Action brought on 17 August 2011 — ZZ and Others v Parliament

41

2011/C 340/86

Case F-83/11: Action brought on 26 August 2011 — ZZ v Commission

41

2011/C 340/87

Case F-84/11: Action brought on 29 August 2011 — ZZ and Others v Court of Justice

42

2011/C 340/88

Case F-85/11: Action brought on 29 August 2011 — ZZ v Commission

42

2011/C 340/89

Case F-86/11: Action brought on 8 September 2011 — ZZ v Committee of the Regions

42

EN