Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/297/05

    Case C-186/05: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — National monopoly on retail sales of alcoholic beverages — Importation by private individuals prohibited)

    IO C 297, 8.12.2007, p. 4–4 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    8.12.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 297/4


    Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

    (Case C-186/05) (1)

    (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - National monopoly on retail sales of alcoholic beverages - Importation by private individuals prohibited)

    (2007/C 297/05)

    Language of the case: Swedish

    Parties

    Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Ström van Lier and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

    Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: K. Wistrand, acting as Agent)

    Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: E. Bygglin, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — National legislation relating to a national monopoly on retail sales of alcoholic beverages prohibiting the direct importation of such beverages by private individuals

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Declares that, by prohibiting the importation of alcoholic beverages by private individuals acting by their designated independent intermediaries or professional transporters, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 28 EC and that prohibition cannot be regarded as being justified under Article 30 EC.

    2.

    Orders the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 171 of 9.7.2005.


    Top