EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/283/77
Case F-17/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 October 2007 — Pouzol v Court of Auditors (Staff cases — Official — Pensions — Transfer of pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the Communities — Inadmissibility)
Case F-17/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 October 2007 — Pouzol v Court of Auditors (Staff cases — Official — Pensions — Transfer of pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the Communities — Inadmissibility)
Case F-17/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 October 2007 — Pouzol v Court of Auditors (Staff cases — Official — Pensions — Transfer of pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the Communities — Inadmissibility)
IO C 283, 24.11.2007, p. 43–43
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
24.11.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 283/43 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 10 October 2007 — Pouzol v Court of Auditors
(Case F-17/07) (1)
(Staff cases - Official - Pensions - Transfer of pension rights acquired before entry into the service of the Communities - Inadmissibility)
(2007/C 283/77)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Michel Pouzol (Combaillaux, France) (represented by: D. Grisay, I. Andoulsi, and D. Piccininno, lawyers)
Defendant: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Stenier and G. Cortens, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the Court of Auditors' decision of 23 November 2006 declaring inadmissible the complaint brought by the applicant against the Commission's decision of 18 May 2006 — Acknowledgment of the applicant's right to a supplementary premium in his years of pensionable service — Application for damages.
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
2. |
Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
(1) OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 35.