Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C2007/095/104

    Case T-66/07: Action brought on 2 March 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM — ( 150 )

    IO C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 52–52 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.4.2007   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 95/52


    Action brought on 2 March 2007 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM — (‘150’)

    (Case T-66/07)

    (2007/C 95/104)

    Language of the case: Polish

    Parties

    Applicant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol, Sp. z o. o. (Częstochowa, Republic of Poland) (represented by: D. Rzążewska, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

    Form of order sought

    set aside in its entirety the decision delivered on 21 December 2006 by the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) in Case No R 1035/2006-4;

    order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘150 ’for goods in Class 16

    Decision of the Examiner: registration refused

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: appeal dismissed

    Pleas in law: incorrect application of the provisions of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark (1), inasmuch as, according to the applicant, the designation ‘150’, in relation to the goods indicated, is neither descriptive nor devoid of distinctive character.


    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).


    Top